Analysis by WorldTribune Staff, April 8, 2025 Real World News
Did the non-stop lawfare against all things Trump end with his election on Nov. 5? Did the president take a break from playing golf this past weekend?
Democrats, RINOS, assorted never-Trumpers and their major media accomplices have been relentless purveyors of their current narrative that President Donald Trump's executive orders have created a "constitutional crisis." This is similar to but different from their earlier concerns that he might not go to prison and instead continue to campaign for a return to the White House.
So they have again deployed an army of lawyers to shop for activist judges to stall Trump's agenda.
“Just since January 20th, we’ve had over 170 lawsuits filed against us. That should be the constitutional crisis right there, 50 injunctions,” Attorney General Pam Bondi told host Shannon Bream on “Fox News Sunday.”
“They’re popping up every single day, trying to control his executive power, trying to control where he believes our tax dollars should be allocated,” Bondi said.
Bondi pointed to Trump's order which bans transgender troops serving in the military. A second federal judge in late March blocked the effort.
“It’s basically a game of whack-a-mole with these District Court judges around the country who have a tremendous amount of power, they believe they do,” Bondi said. “But that’s why we’re appealing all of these cases of course up to the Supreme Court.”
The president, Bondi added, "is implementing that agenda at a rapid speed. None of us can keep up with him every single day. And so it’s just we’re going after all of these lawsuits. We’re defending them all. We just got a great win. And we’ll continue to fight every day.”
The win Bondi was referencing was a recent Supreme Court decision that, by a 5-4 vote, permitted Trump to temporarily suspend about $65 million in teacher training grants linked to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives.
Bondi said she remained optimistic in fighting the deluge of lawsuits:
“We’re going to be very successful on all of these.
“To give you an example of a case, Department of Defense. So we had its military readiness. And that’s one of the president’s top agendas as is [Defense Secretary] Pete Hegseth. “So in the district court, a district court in D.C. ruled against us on military readiness, meaning gender dysphoria, ruled against us. We appealed that to the circuit court and we won. The second we won, within minutes, In California, they filed an identical lawsuit and we lost. So that’s what we’re up against.”
Support Free Press Foundation
