Predetermined algorithms caused the 2020 election in Arizona's Maricopa County to be skewed toward a win for Joe Biden, according to pattern recognition specialist Jovan Pulitzer.
Approximately 407,000 of the over 2.1 million ballots cast in Maricopa County were “of a predetermined origin” because of the use of algorithms, UncoverDC reported on June 29 in a comprehensive analysis of Pulitzer's June 27 presentation of his findings.
Pulitzer said his forensic kinematic investigation of the ballots shows "sufficient and irrefutable evidence of pervasive voter fraud and widespread election fraud in Maricopa County, Arizona.”
Pulitzer explained that the 2020 outcome in Maricopa County was predetermined because “specific ballots” were repeatedly and fraudulently inserted.
A kinematic investigation means Pulitzer followed the physical and cyber “trail” of the Maricopa County ballots from the time they were manufactured to the “printing, the folding, sorting, and mailing” of those ballots. Pulitzer then “followed the mailing process, the return process, the election handling process, and eventual scanning, tallying, and election recording of the votes — and reporting of the final outcome.”
Of the mail-in ballots for Joe Biden, 38 percent were found to be of a predetermined nature while 33 percent of the ballots for President Donald Trump on election day were predetermined. After removing the fraudulently cast ballots, Trump got 59% of the votes. To find that “true vote,” Pulitzer said he removed the ballots contributing to the predetermined outcome. Biden got just 41 percent of the vote after the removal of the predetermined ballots.
Biden reportedly won Arizona by less than 11,000 votes.
In addition, Pulitzer said he drilled his investigation down to the precinct level. He and his team processed over 20,895,610 digital and forensic images in multiple formats.
Pulitzer said he is confident that when the algorithm could not keep pace with the votes coming in for Trump, “paper ballots had to be created to match the electronic outcome.” Pulitzer said he found ample evidence of many ballot boxes that were “pilfered.” The boxes were “opened and reopened over time to either insert or remove ballots.”
Pallet upon pallet of boxes was dual-dated, Pulitzer added. That translates to ballots with multiple dates and multiple months all mixed in, a finding that is “not congruent with how these ballots should be processed.” 89 percent of the dual date batches “were decided for Joe Biden,” according to Pulitzer. He stated that election workers “with decades of experience had never seen such dual date batches.”
Pulitzer believes the boxes were “pilfered to make the paper match the digital outcome.”
Pulitzer also explained how profoundly the 2020 election was allegedly subverted because of the Covid pandemic.
Runbeck printed the ballots for many elections, including Maricopa. Pulitzer explained:
“We got no Runbeck records. We got no postal records for some reason for the roughly 2,545,000 voters mailed 4,089,000 ballots. That means Runbeck printed over 4,089,000 ballots. We don’t have an answer for that. That is why ballot cracking is key.”
News of the pandemic began to emerge in early 2020. However, Pulitzer points out that the first holiday government officials told Americans to stay home was on the 4th of July. In August, many states decided to go with mail-in ballots.
Pulitzer then refers to something odd that Runbeck did in March and another odd thing the Post Office pulled in April:
"Runbeck placed the largest order in the world ever for ballot envelope stuffing machines on March 1 — How did they know? I have the order and everything.
"Our United States Post Office has what’s called a mail cover system. This is how when somebody sends anthrax to the president; you’re able to track it. And our Postal Service, when that comes in and goes on the conveyor belt, it snaps the front and back photo and it’s automatic. Those records are kept for six years — for investigational work like we do.
"As soon as Runbeck ordered, the machines our United States Post Office stopped its mail cover program — on April 1. It undid it from six years and changed it to 30 days. Let the election run, let Biden get installed, and then turned it back on. We do not have the physical evidence trial. That’s what I was telling you. This is the highest levels of the government. This is how far it goes."
Among Pulitzer's other findings:
• Maricopa used paper that was so thin it allowed for bleedthrough on the ballots, which, in turn, caused massive forced adjudication of ballots. To run an honest election, the paper must be the correct printing density, and the printing machines must be properly maintained and calibrated. Pulitzer said that “343,304 ballots were printed out of mechanical compliance,” with no one supervising or inspecting the printers.
• 10,943 Maricopa general election ballots were straight-up “counterfeit ballots.” The use of these counterfeit ballots “was widespread across all of Maricopa County,” according to Pulitzer. 39 percent of the counterfeit ballots were cast for Donald Trump, and 46 percent were cast for Biden. Thirteen percent were cast for write-in candidates.
• 235,367 ballots were changed “either by a human or a machine” in the election “after the ballots were tallied.” Not only that, he said, “99 percent of all batches were modified.” Remarkably, the ballots were modified electronically “without ANY inspection of the physical ballot paper.”
• There were 246,691 phantom voters on the Maricopa rolls as a result of dirty voter rolls. Nefarious actors can use ballot-cracking and other methods to backfill votes when you have overinflated rolls of 10 percent—as was the case in Maricopa. There was an average of 332 phantom voters per precinct in the county. And “they are almost always wiped from the voter rolls” immediately following an election. “26 percent of the 2020 win were scrubbed immediately following the Maricopa election,” according to Pulitzer.
Pulitzer said he is still knee-deep in the investigation.
(You can view Pulitzer's entire presentation here.)
About . . . . Intelligence . . . . Membership
